Maryland: A leader in the fight on global warming

For more than a decade, Maryland has been at the forefront of national efforts to shift to clean energy and to reduce pollution that contributes to global warming. 

By adopting strong policies, including a cap on the state’s global warming emissions, clean cars standards, renewable energy standards, strong energy efficiency programs, and tough emission standards for power plants, our state has shown that taking action to reduce global warming pollution can work.

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative is a global warming program that works

In 2006, Maryland officials joined with New York, Delaware, and other states in the Northeast to establish one of the most important global warming reduction programs in the country — the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

RGGI has broken important ground. It’s the first program in the United States to limit global warming emissions from power plants, sell permits to emit carbon and invest the revenues in energy efficiency and clean energy initiatives. Even more importantly, RGGI is a model for the country. It has demonstrated that other states, other regions, and the nation as a whole could use a similar model to reduce emissions.

And so far, RGGI has been a tremendous success.  Maryland is investing 100 percent of proceeds, more than $51 million dollars so far, on programs to improve energy efficiency and to accelerate the development of cleaner energy sources.  RGGI has already contributed to nearly $1.6 billion in consumer savings, 1,309 new jobs, and $189 million in economic growth in our state.

Maryland must hold the line since RGGI is under attack in Maine, New Hampshire and New Jersey.

Fossil fuel interests, led by Americans for Prosperity and other anti-regulatory ideologues, and emboldened by the 2010 elections and the tough economy, have convinced their allies in a number of states to support killing RGGI.  As a result, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, the New Hampshire House of Representatives and Maine’s Governor Le Page have all announced their opposition to RGGI, and have attempted to kill or weaken the program. Backsliding on this precedent-setting policy would have serious repercussions in the overall debate on the response to global warming.

RGGI is only as effective as the participating states allow it to be. That’s why it’s so important for Maryland to hold the line by taking an active role in supporting RGGI, and making it even stronger.

Fortunately, there is strong public support in Maryland for reducing pollution from power plants and shifting to clean energy.  Environment Maryland staff are working with a broad coalition, including local and state officials, organized labor, public health organizations and more, to convince state officials that RGGI is critical to Maryland’s efforts to meet our energy and environmental goals.  

With your support, we can strengthen RGGI and cut global warming pollution.

In December, we worked with our allies to sign on 250 environmental groups, clean energy businesses, and public health officials to a set of principles to strengthen the program. We presented these principles to the top energy and environmental officials in the other Northeast states in RGGI.

In January, Maryland officials joined officials from Rhode Island, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New York, and Vermont in announcing their intention to begin the process of strengthening the RGGI emissions cap.

We’re making progress — but we need your support to defend and strengthen RGGI. Join our campaign today, and urge Gov. O'Malley to strengthen RGGI so we can expand Maryland’s efforts to reduce global warming pollution from power plants and shift to clean energy.


Global Warming Solutions

News Release | Environment Maryland

A Key Step Forward for Offshore Wind in Maryland the Obama Administration Announces

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced a major step toward developing wind energy off the coasts of Maryland, New Jersey, Delaware, and Virginia this morning. Joined by Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Director Tommy P. Beaudreau in Baltimore, Secretary Salazar announced that the environmental review of the proposed areas for wind development found no significant impacts, signaling a step closer to wind turbines spinning off our coasts.

> Keep Reading
News Release | Environment Maryland

House Transportation Bill Drives Us To Deeper Oil Dependence

Representative John Mica (R-FL), Chairman of the House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, officially introduced a major transportation reauthorization bill. The overall plan for the bill includes proposals to open the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as well as the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, and to open landscapes in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to oil shale extraction. At the same time, it cuts all funding for biking and walking safety and cripples environmental review for transportation projects.

> Keep Reading
News Release | Environment Maryland

Offshore Wind and Manure Management Regulations Top Environment Maryland’s Legislative Agenda for 2012

The full agenda outlines the Environment Maryland’s plans to restore the Chesapeake Bay, repower Maryland with clean energy, reduce global warming pollution, protect the state from natural gas drilling, preserve Maryland’s open spaces, and improve Marylanders’ quality of life.

> Keep Reading
News Release

Nuclear Power Plants Threaten Drinking Water for 200,000 Marylanders

The drinking water for 200,000 people in Maryland could be at risk of radioactive contamination from a leak or accident at a local nuclear power plant according to a new report called Too Close to Home: Nuclear Power and the Threat to Drinking Water released by Maryland PIRG Foundation (Maryland PIRG) and Environment Maryland Research and Policy Center.

> Keep Reading
Report | Environment Maryland Research & Policy Center

Too Close to Home: Nuclear Power and the Threat to Drinking Water

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, which took place in March 2011, delivered a reminder to the world that nuclear power comes with inherent risks. In the United States, 49 million Americans receive their drinking water from surface sources located within 50 miles of an active nuclear power plant —inside the boundary the Nuclear Regulatory Commission uses to assess risk to food and water supplies.

> Keep Reading

Pages

View AllRSS Feed