Baltimore—Just
weeks after the strongest global warming legislation in history was introduced in
Congress, a new report released today by the Environment Maryland shows how the
U.S. can meet – and even exceed – the legislation’s goals. The report finds that the U.S. can reduce its global warming
emissions by nearly 20 percent within the next 15 years by boosting energy efficiency
and renewable energy.
Rising to the Challenge: Six Steps
to Cut Global Warming Pollution in the United States is the first report to provide a national
blueprint for achieving the short-term cuts in emissions that science shows are
needed to put the U.S.
on a path to avoid the worst effects of a warming world.
“This
report shows that we can do something about global warming, using tools that
already exist, and that our economy likely will be stronger – and our lives
better – if we do,” said Environment Maryland State Director Brad Heavner.
The report
details six challenging but feasible steps to improve the energy efficiency of
our economy and use more renewable energy.
These strategies, coupled with strong, mandatory limits on global
warming emissions, would reduce U.S.
global warming emissions by 19% below 2004 levels by 2020 (see chart below). At the same time, the steps would improve
American’s long-term economic and energy security. The six steps include:
1. Stabilize vehicle travel. Americans drive nearly twice as many miles per year as
they did a quarter-century ago, leading to increased emissions of global
warming pollutants. Americans are
already cutting back on driving as a result of higher gasoline prices, but many
Americans have few realistic alternatives to driving. Through changes in public policy and
development patterns, Americans can be given more transportation choices, thus
reducing the growth in vehicle travel.
2. Increase vehicle fuel economy
standards to 40 miles per gallon and set fuel economy standards for large
trucks. Establishing federal fuel economy
standards for cars during the 1970s succeeded in reducing gasoline consumption
and oil imports, as well as global warming pollution. But the fuel economy of new vehicles is now
lower than it was during most of the Reagan administration. All types of vehicles – from SUVs to compact
cars – can be designed to be far more energy efficient using technologies that
already exist or will soon be available.
Similarly, major improvements in fuel economy are possible for
heavy-duty trucks, which are currently exempt from fuel economy standards.
3. Replace 10% of vehicle fuel with
biofuels or other clean alternatives. Ethanol and
biodiesel that are produced cleanly and sustainably have the potential to
significantly reduce global warming emissions from transportation, especially
if these biofuels are produced from plant wastes and cellulose. Other vehicle technologies – like “plug-in”
hybrids, electric vehicles and fuel cell vehicles – have the potential to
dramatically reduce global warming emissions in the future.
4. Reduce energy consumption in
homes, business, and industry by 10% from current levels.
Dramatic improvements in energy efficiency are possible in virtually
every aspect of American life. For now,
the U.S.
can encourage weatherization of buildings, deployment of more efficient
appliances and equipment, and efficiency improvements in industry. Soon, using new technologies such as those in
zero-energy homes, we can transform the way we consume energy and achieve even
larger improvements in efficiency.
5. Obtain 20% of our electricity from
new renewable energy sources. America has virtually limitless
potential for the generation of power from natural forces. By ramping up our use of wind power, solar
power, geothermal and biomass energy, and other renewable forms of energy – and
using much of that energy to replace power production at dirty, coal-fired
power plants – the U.S.
could dramatically reduce global warming emissions from electric power
production.
6. Hold emissions from other sources
to current levels. The five strategies listed above would
address the largest sources of energy use and global warming emissions in the U.S. But some other sources of global warming
pollution – such as emissions from air travel and emissions of some non-carbon
dioxide global warming gases – are projected to increase significantly in the
years ahead. The U.S. must stabilize, and eventually
reduce, global warming pollution from all sectors of the economy.
“Taking
these steps would be a sizable down payment on the larger pollution reductions
that the U.S. will need to achieve in the decades ahead to keep global warming
in check,” said Heavner.
To avoid
the worst consequences of global warming, the U.S. must stabilize emissions
within the next decade, begin reducing them soon thereafter, and cut global
warming pollution by 80% by the middle of this century.
The steps
outlined in this report also would reduce U.S. dependence on scare fossil fuels
and, in many cases, create jobs and save money.
“The
potential payback from these efforts is tremendous—both in avoided economic and
environmental impacts from global warming and in the establishment of a more
secure energy future for the U.S. The result would be a cleaner, more
sustainable foundation on which to build America’s economy for the 21st
century,” said Heavner.
Earlier
this summer, Rep. Henry Waxman of California
and Sen. James Jeffords of Vermont introduced legislation
that would reduce U.S.
global warming emissions by 13% below 2004 levels by 2020 and 80% below 2004
levels by 2050. Among the Maryland Congressional
delegation, Sen. Sarbanes and Reps. Cardin, Cummings, Van Hollen, and Wynn have
co-sponsored the legislation. Environment
Maryland
calls on Sen. Mikulski and Reps. Bartlett, Gilchrest, Hoyer, and Ruppersburger to
become co-sponsors.
At the
state level, Maryland
has taken its first steps toward addressing global warming with the Healthy Air
Act, passed by the General Assembly this year, as well as energy efficiency and
renewable energy legislation passed in previous legislative sessions. In the coming session, legislators will
debate the Clean Cars Act, which would require that automakers reduce the
global warming pollution from new cars and trucks.
Global Warming
Emissions Impact of the Six Steps (million metric tons carbon dioxide
equivalent)
|
Strategy
|
Savings MMTCO2E
|
|
Stabilize
Vehicle Travel
|
0*
|
|
40 MPG
Fuel Economy and Heavy-Duty Truck Fuel Economy Standards
|
383
|
|
10% of
Transportation Fuel from Renewables
|
61
|
|
10%
Reduction in Energy Consumption
|
400
|
|
20% of
Electricity from New Renewables
|
511
|
|
Total Savings
|
1355
|
|
2004 U.S.
Global Warming Emissions
|
7122
|
|
Reduction Relative to 2004
|
19%
|
* Avoids increase in emissions
resulting from projected increases in vehicle travel between now and 2020.