logo

Clean Energy News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
2007-01-19
For More Information:
Contact Brad Heavner
(410) 467-0439
(410) 267-1900 (Annapolis during session)

Maryland Congressional Delegation Is Unanimous for Clean Energy Bill

Yesterday the House of Representatives voted 264-163 to pass “The C.L.E.A.N. Energy Act of 2007,” (H.R. 6) which would close some tax loopholes for big oil companies, and recover royalties from oil and gas produced in public waters.  H.R. 6 will shift more than $14 billion from these subsidies to investments in clean energy, such as energy efficient technologies and renewable power.  The bill was the last of the six bills brought up for consideration during the House’s first 100 legislative hours.

All eight of Maryland’s representatives voted in favor of the bill.

“Today the 110th Congress made a down payment on a new energy future,” said Environment Maryland State Director Brad Heavner. “Marylanders should be proud that our representatives all supported this legislation.”

H.R. 6 would establish a “clean energy fund” that would create incentives for and investments in energy efficient and renewable energy technologies.  These funds could:

  • Spur the construction of wind and solar energy power generation facilities.
  • Save consumers money on their energy bills with incentives for energy efficient   appliances, buildings, and equipment.
  • Enable more to purchase gas-saving hybrid cars and trucks.

The resources for the fund would come from the elimination of more than $14 billion in subsidies and tax breaks that benefit oil and gas companies that made record profits over the past few years.  The bill would provide a strong incentive for oil companies to renegotiate offshore drilling leases signed in 1998 and 1999 that provided unlimited royalty relief.  It would also repeal several royalty relief provisions authorized in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. 

A recent study by the U.S. Department of Interior found that royalty relief has led to “only a tiny increase in production,” (New York Times, 12/22/06) but would cost nearly $48 billion over the next 40 years.

The bill would also prevent major oil companies such as ExxonMobil from claiming a tax break for “geological and geophysical” expenditures enacted in 2005. It would also remove a tax benefit from 2004 that lowers the income tax rate paid by oil companies by reclassifying oil and gas production as a manufactured good.